Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Israel, Palestine, & the Quest for Middle East Peace]( "Israel, Palestine, & the Quest for Middle East Peace")
Israel, Palestine, & the Quest for Middle East Peace42,99 €![The Press and the Modern Presidency]( "The Press and the Modern Presidency")
The Press and the Modern Presidency95,99 €![The Press and the Bush Presidency]( "The Press and the Bush Presidency")
The Press and the Bush Presidency94,99 €![The Press and the Modern Presidency]( "The Press and the Modern Presidency")
The Press and the Modern Presidency48,99 €![One Palestine, Complete]( "One Palestine, Complete")
One Palestine, Complete28,99 €![Travels in Palestine, Through the Countries of Bashan and Gilead, East of the River Jordan]( "Travels in Palestine, Through the Countries of Bashan and Gilead, East of the River Jordan")
Travels in Palestine, Through the Countries of Bashan and Gilead, East of the River Jordan67,99 €![A History of Palestine, 634 1099]( "A History of Palestine, 634 1099")
A History of Palestine, 634 109986,99 €
In this absorbing book, Bruce J. Evensen analyzes the role of the mass media, public opinion, and the Zionists in the evolution of America's Palestine policy during the Truman administration. Taking issue with recent revisionist historians who argue that Truman had little difficulty manipulating public opinion, Evensen claims that the press and an aroused public opinion successfully frustrated the President's course on Palestine and elicited his support of the United Nations' partition of Jewish and Arab states and Truman's early recognition of Israel. Evensen emphasizes the development of a conventional wisdom that placed the Middle East at the center of U.S. strategic planning and saw limiting Soviet penetration as a primary goal. Within this context, he shows a divided Truman administration, which was uncertain how to act on the Jewish state. Reluctantly, the administration initially supported the UN's vote to partition the region; then, as Palestine erupted into violence, it attempted to abandon this decision. Interpreting the President's action as a gutless appeasement of the Arabs and an indication of his fear of the Soviets, the media, reflecting the public's Cold War fears, confronted the administration's policy in the Middle East and frustrated the President's effort to abandon the partition scheme. The media's role in reflecting and shaping competing visions of reality, which became the conventional wisdom of policy making, is a key part of this study.