Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Reworking the Bench]( "Reworking the Bench")
Reworking the Bench110,99 €![Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy]( "Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy")
Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy62,99 €![Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science]( "Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science")
Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science117,99 €![Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twenthieth Century]( "Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twenthieth Century")
Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twenthieth Century147,99 €![Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twentieth Century, Book One]( "Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twentieth Century, Book One")
Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twentieth Century, Book One50,99 €![The Logic of Discovery]( "The Logic of Discovery")
The Logic of Discovery179,99 €![Observability and Observation in Physical Science]( "Observability and Observation in Physical Science")
Observability and Observation in Physical Science117,99 €
Research records composed of notes and protocols have long played a role in the efforts to understand the origins of what have come to be seen as the established milestones in the development of modern science. The use of research records to probe the nature of scientific investigation itself however is a recent development in the history of science.
With Eduard Dijksterhuis, we could address them as a veritable "epistemologiCal laboratory". The purpose of a workshop entitled "Reworking the Bench: Laboratory Notebooks in the History of Science", held at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin was to bring together historians who have been exploiting such resources, to compare the similarities and differences in the materials they had used and and to measure the potential and scope for future explorations of "science in the making" based on such forms of documentation. The contributions which form this volume are based on papers presented at this workshopor written afterward by participants in the discussions.
This is the first book that addresses the issue of research notes for writing history of science in a comprehensive manner. Its case studies range from the early modern period to present and cover a broad range of different disciplines.
With Eduard Dijksterhuis, we could address them as a veritable "epistemologiCal laboratory". The purpose of a workshop entitled "Reworking the Bench: Laboratory Notebooks in the History of Science", held at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin was to bring together historians who have been exploiting such resources, to compare the similarities and differences in the materials they had used and and to measure the potential and scope for future explorations of "science in the making" based on such forms of documentation. The contributions which form this volume are based on papers presented at this workshopor written afterward by participants in the discussions.
This is the first book that addresses the issue of research notes for writing history of science in a comprehensive manner. Its case studies range from the early modern period to present and cover a broad range of different disciplines.
From the reviews:
"Reworking the Bench provides a splendid survey of the work of 15 historians of science, experts in different areas and periods of modern age, with many years of experience in this kind of historical investigation. ... the essays also contain interesting general epistemological results. ... research notes prove to be indispensable for disclosing the underlying aspects of research that are kept secret by the official accounts like published articles or autobiographical records." (Ariane Dröscher, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Vol. 27, 2005)
"Reworking the Bench provides a splendid survey of the work of 15 historians of science, experts in different areas and periods of modern age, with many years of experience in this kind of historical investigation. ... the essays also contain interesting general epistemological results. ... research notes prove to be indispensable for disclosing the underlying aspects of research that are kept secret by the official accounts like published articles or autobiographical records." (Ariane Dröscher, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Vol. 27, 2005)