Courts and Comparative Law

Herausgeber: Andenas, Mads; Fairgrieve, Duncan

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

A critical analysis of the use of comparative and foreign law by courts across the globe, this book provides an inclusive, coherent, and practical analysis of comparative reasoning in the forensic process.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Sydney University Press
• Seitenzahl: 816
• Erscheinungstermin: 23. September 2015
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 278mm x 149mm x 47mm
• Gewicht: 1606g
• ISBN-13: 9780198735335
• ISBN-10: 0198735332
• Artikelnr.: 47866498

Autorenporträt

Mads Andenas is Professor at the University of Oslo, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, and Visiting Fellow at the Institute of European and Comparative Law, University of Oxford. He is the UN Special Rapporteur on Arbitrary Detention and the chair of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. He was the Director of the Centre of European Law, King's College, University of London, between 1992 and 1999 and the Director of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law between 1999 and 2005. Duncan Fairgrieve is Senior Fellow in Comparative Law at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, London, and Professeur Associé at Université de Paris Dauphine. He holds degrees from Oxford, London, and Paris. He has published widely in the field of comparative law in English and French. He practices as an avocat at the Paris Bar and as a Barrister at One Crown Office Row, London.

Inhaltsangabe

* 1.: Mads Andenas and Duncan Fairgrieve: Introduction - Courts and
Comparative Law: In Search of Common Language for Open Legal Systems
* Part I: Conflicts and Comparisons
* 2.: Thomas Kadner Graziano: Is it Legitimate and Beneficial for
Judges to Use Comparative Law?
* 3.: Geoffrey Samuel: Comparative Law and the Courts: What is
Comparative and What is Law?
* 4.: Bénédicte Fauvarque-Cosson: Foreign Law before the French Courts:
The Conflicts of Law Perspective
* 5.: Richard Fentiman: Foreign Law in National Courts: A Common Law
Perspective
* 6.: Guido Alpa: Foreign Law in International Legal Practice
* Part II: Comparative Law Within a European and International Law
Context
* 7.: Paul Mahoney and Rachael Kondak: Common Ground: A Starting Point
or Destination for Comparative Law Analysis by the European Court of
Human Rights?
* 8.: Koen Lenaerts and Kathleen Gutman: Comparative Law and the Court
of Justice of the European Union: Interlocking Legal Orders Revisted
* 9.: Ermanno Calzolaio: National Judges and Strasbourg Case Law:
Comparative Reflections About the Italian Experience
* 10.: Haris Tagaras: Comparative Law and the European Union Civil
Service Tribunal
* 11.: Martin Gelter and Mathias Siems: Networks, Dialogue, or One-Way
Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations Between Ten of
Europe's Highest Courts
* 12.: Eirik Bjorge: Comparative Law and the Method of Law:
Ascertainment of the International Court of Justice
* Part III: Comparative Law Before Administrative Courts
* 13.: Olivier Dutheillet de Lamothe: Comparative Law as an Essential
Feature of French Public Law
* 14.: Aurélie Bretonneau, Samuel Dahan, Duncan Fairgrieve: Comparative
Legal Methodology of the Conseil d'Etat: Towards an Innovative
Judicial Process?
* 15.: Francois Lichère: The Use of Comparative Law Before the French
Administrative Law Courts: Or the Triumph of Castles Over Pyramids
* 16.: Aldo Sandulli: The Use of Comparative Law Before the Italian
Public Law Courts
* 17.: Peter M. Huber and Andreas L. Paulus: Cooperation of
Constitutional Courts in Europe - The Openness of the German
Constitution to International, European, and Comparative
Constitutional Law
* 18.: Ana Maria Guerra Martins and Miguel Prata Roque: Judicial
Dialogue in a Multilevel Constitutional Network: The Role of the
Portuguese Constitutional Court
* 19.: Lucio Pegoraro: Judges and Professors: the Influence of Foreign
Scholarship on Constitutional Courts' Decisions
* 20.: Christa Rautenbach: South Africa: Teaching an 'Old Dog' New
Tricks? An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the
South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010)
* 21.: Gianluca Gentili: Enhancing Constitutional Self-Understanding
through Comparative Law: An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign
Case Law by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2013)
* 22.: Elaine Mak: Comparative Law Before the Supreme Courts of the UK
and the Netherlands: An Empirical and Comparative Analysis
* 23.: Judith Resnik: Constructing the 'Foreign': American Law's
Relationship to Non-Domestic Sources
* 24.: Guy Canivet: The Use of Comparative Law Before the French
Private Law Courts
* 25.: Alexis Albarian: The Use of Comparative Law Before the French
Cour de Cassation : The View From Academia
* 26.: Annalisa Aschieri: Italian Courts and Comparative Law
* 27.: Martha Minow: The Controversial Status of International and
Comparative Law in the United States
* 28.: Jeremy Waldron: Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium
* 29.: Marta Requejo Isidro and Marta Otero Crespo: Comparative Law
Before the Spanish Private Law Courts in the XXI Century
* 30.: H. Patrick Glenn: Comparative Legal Reasoning and the Courts: A
View from the Americas
* 31.: Hannes Unberath and Astrid Stadler: Comparative Law in the
German Courts
* 32.: Kerstin Steiner: Comparative Law in the Syariah Courts: A Case
Study of Singapore, Malaysia, and Brunei
* Part VI: Using Comparative Law: Case Studies
* 33.: Bernard Rabatel and Olivier Deparis: Liaison Magistrates: Their
Role in International Judicial Cooperation and Comparative Law
* 34.: Geraint Howells and Jonathon Watson: Comparative Law in Consumer
Litigation
* 35.: Romain M. Lorentz: The Use of Comparative Law by Courts in
Birth-Related Tort Cases
* 36.: His Honour Judge Michael Brooke QC and Ian Forrester Q.C: The
Use of Comparative Law in A and Others v National Blood Authority
* 37.: Erdem Büyüksagis: What Europeans Can Learn from an Untold Story
of Transjudicial Communication: The Swiss-Turkish Experience
* 38.: Galateia Kalouta: DCFR in the Courts: The Remaking of
Comparative Law