Kathryn C. Ibata-Arens
Beyond Technonationalism: Biomedical Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Asia
69,99 €
versandkostenfrei*
inkl. MwSt.
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
Versandkostenfrei innerhalb Deutschlands
35 °P sammeln
Kathryn C. Ibata-Arens
Beyond Technonationalism: Biomedical Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Asia
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Kathryn C. Ibata-Arens is Vincent de Paul Professor of Political Science and Director of the Global Asian Studies Program at DePaul University. She is the author of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Japan: Politics, Organizations, and High Technology Firms.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Arvind PanagariyaState Level Reforms, Growth, and Development in Indian States79,99 €
- Franco MalerbaInnovation and the Evolution of Industries: History-Friendly Models117,99 €
- Mary Lindenstein WalshokInvention and Reinvention: The Evolution of San Diegoas Innovation Economy85,99 €
- John R. BellCapitalism and the Dialectic: The Uno-Sekine Approach to Marxian Political Economy111,99 €
- Ulrike SchaedeThe Business Reinvention of Japan: How to Make Sense of the New Japan and Why It Matters31,99 €
- Manufacturing Transformation: Comparative Studies of Industrial Development in Africa and Emerging Asia104,99 €
- Shiri M. BreznitzThe Fountain of Knowledge: The Role of Universities in Economic Development65,99 €
Kathryn C. Ibata-Arens is Vincent de Paul Professor of Political Science and Director of the Global Asian Studies Program at DePaul University. She is the author of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Japan: Politics, Organizations, and High Technology Firms.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Innovation and Technology in t
- Verlag: STANFORD BUSINESS BOOKS
- Seitenzahl: 352
- Erscheinungstermin: 16. April 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 159mm x 234mm x 28mm
- Gewicht: 630g
- ISBN-13: 9781503605473
- ISBN-10: 1503605477
- Artikelnr.: 53544182
- Innovation and Technology in t
- Verlag: STANFORD BUSINESS BOOKS
- Seitenzahl: 352
- Erscheinungstermin: 16. April 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 159mm x 234mm x 28mm
- Gewicht: 630g
- ISBN-13: 9781503605473
- ISBN-10: 1503605477
- Artikelnr.: 53544182
Kathryn C. Ibata-Arens is Vincent de Paul Professor of Political Science and Director of the Global Asian Studies Program at DePaul University. She is the author of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Japan: Politics, Organizations, and High Technology Firms.
Contents and Abstracts 1Introduction chapter abstract The book discusses the importance of global competition in biomedical and new-technology sectors to understanding international trade and investment in the twenty-first century. It argues that countries that pursue networked technonationalism (NTN) have been the most effective in improving innovation capacity and fostering frontier-industry growth. Technonationalism is state-led strategic investment in new technologies
perceived as key to national security. From the most closed system (Japan's classic technonationalism) to the most open
or technoglobal system (Singapore) technationalism exists on a continuum. A typology of knowledge and network regimes is proposed to explain variations in domestic capacities
institutions
and policy and network practices. Comparisons of human capital development (STEM education)
knowledge production (scientific citations and patents)
institutions supporting innovation (technology licensing organizations
incubators)
and interfirm networks and international openness (inward foreign direct investment
engaging with diaspora
and immigration) elucidate distinctions. 2Theory and Methods chapter abstract This chapter develops a matrix that plots variations in open/tacit versus closed/codified system architectures supporting or limiting innovation capacity and new-business creation in targeted sectors. Aggregate global- and microlevel data are analyzed to identify concentrations of innovation and firm-level activity. Emerging hubs of knowledge and firm creation in biomedical industries
including biopharmaceuticals
are identified. Aggregate data is supplemented with firm-level case studies and interviews with entrepreneurs
government officials
incubation managers
and investors. The conceptual framework outlined in Chapter 1 and specified in Chapter 2 provides the lens through which innovation and entrepreneurship strategies in China
India
Japan
and Singapore are viewed. The analysis is supplemented with firm-level entrepreneurial case studies. 3Classic Technonationalism in Japan chapter abstract Japan's strengths in intellectual property production have since the 1990s failed to translate into globally competitive new-product and new-business creation. Insular institutions and business practices have created "sticky" networks. These structures
while protecting weak industries from global competition
have trapped nascent entrepreneurs and undermined human-capital development. Yet Japan remains the largest market for biomedical products and services in Asia. Its aging population is driving ever-increasing health care consumption
while the shrinking size of its working population means that growth must be based on productivity gains. These demographics provide opportunities for foreign firms and investors to enter Japan
potentially enriching Japanese networks in the future. The Japanese state has encouraged international science and technology collaborations since 2000
which has led to growth in international copatenting
a potential first step to broader internationalization and open networks. 4New Networked Technonationalism in China chapter abstract Features of China's networked technonationalism (NTN) include aggressive science
technology
engineering
and math (STEM) education and entrepreneurship policies. Further
the biomedical industry has been identified by political and economic leaders as a "strategic emerging industry" and has become a focal point of state-led economic development. In contrast to Japan's insular and closed ("sticky") domestic knowledge and business networks
since the 1970s China's expatriate and diaspora returnee communities and active inward FDI have contributed to evolving globally competitive business networks. Over time
China used its growing domestic market as a lure to foreign firms from which technology appropriation can occur. However
China's population size and urban-rural disparities mean that egalitarian redistribution of new wealth has not been guaranteed in this system. Further
introduction of Western chemical pharmaceuticals threaten traditional medicine and therapies. 5From Closed to Open in India chapter abstract Decades ago
led by the technonational rhetoric of self-reliance and improvement in human health
India delayed opening its market. Consequently
India spent decades on import substitution and other exclusionary policies in a classic technonational system architecture like Japan. Later
India invested in generic-drug research and development and production capacity
complemented by advances in information technology. State-led human-capital development-for example
in the semi-independent Indian Institutes of Technologies (IITs)-targeted initially information technology and more recently has focused on biomedicine. Expatriate and diaspora returnee networks of Indian professionals
via its networked technonational architecture
since the 1990s have contributed to the development of innovative capacity and new ventures
but at a slower pace than in China. 6Singapore chapter abstract Singapore's developmental model had to be based within its multiethnic Chinese
Indian
and Malay population and from its very inception was global in outlook. Its meritocratic Economic Development Board (EDB) and Agency for Science
Technology and Research (A*STAR) tied inward FDI to domestic human-capital development and redistribution of internationally derived wealth to its domestic population. Its "guppies to whales" human-capital development programs contributed to productivity gains through attracting the region's best and brightest STEM youth and offering them citizenship. While the Singaporean city-state's small population has proven an impediment to establishing a critical mass of new technology entrepreneurs
open immigration policies have the potential to fast-track future developments. However
indigenous Singaporeans have been displaced in this process. 7Conclusion chapter abstract Chapter 7 summarizes the key findings of the book
reflecting on the framework of networked technonationalism and the conceptual typology of knowledge and networks. It compares variations in networked technonationalism as measured by variation in the knowledge and network architecture and governance regimes in China
India
Japan
and Singapore. The book concludes with theory and policy implications of networked technonationalism for Asia and the world economy.
perceived as key to national security. From the most closed system (Japan's classic technonationalism) to the most open
or technoglobal system (Singapore) technationalism exists on a continuum. A typology of knowledge and network regimes is proposed to explain variations in domestic capacities
institutions
and policy and network practices. Comparisons of human capital development (STEM education)
knowledge production (scientific citations and patents)
institutions supporting innovation (technology licensing organizations
incubators)
and interfirm networks and international openness (inward foreign direct investment
engaging with diaspora
and immigration) elucidate distinctions. 2Theory and Methods chapter abstract This chapter develops a matrix that plots variations in open/tacit versus closed/codified system architectures supporting or limiting innovation capacity and new-business creation in targeted sectors. Aggregate global- and microlevel data are analyzed to identify concentrations of innovation and firm-level activity. Emerging hubs of knowledge and firm creation in biomedical industries
including biopharmaceuticals
are identified. Aggregate data is supplemented with firm-level case studies and interviews with entrepreneurs
government officials
incubation managers
and investors. The conceptual framework outlined in Chapter 1 and specified in Chapter 2 provides the lens through which innovation and entrepreneurship strategies in China
India
Japan
and Singapore are viewed. The analysis is supplemented with firm-level entrepreneurial case studies. 3Classic Technonationalism in Japan chapter abstract Japan's strengths in intellectual property production have since the 1990s failed to translate into globally competitive new-product and new-business creation. Insular institutions and business practices have created "sticky" networks. These structures
while protecting weak industries from global competition
have trapped nascent entrepreneurs and undermined human-capital development. Yet Japan remains the largest market for biomedical products and services in Asia. Its aging population is driving ever-increasing health care consumption
while the shrinking size of its working population means that growth must be based on productivity gains. These demographics provide opportunities for foreign firms and investors to enter Japan
potentially enriching Japanese networks in the future. The Japanese state has encouraged international science and technology collaborations since 2000
which has led to growth in international copatenting
a potential first step to broader internationalization and open networks. 4New Networked Technonationalism in China chapter abstract Features of China's networked technonationalism (NTN) include aggressive science
technology
engineering
and math (STEM) education and entrepreneurship policies. Further
the biomedical industry has been identified by political and economic leaders as a "strategic emerging industry" and has become a focal point of state-led economic development. In contrast to Japan's insular and closed ("sticky") domestic knowledge and business networks
since the 1970s China's expatriate and diaspora returnee communities and active inward FDI have contributed to evolving globally competitive business networks. Over time
China used its growing domestic market as a lure to foreign firms from which technology appropriation can occur. However
China's population size and urban-rural disparities mean that egalitarian redistribution of new wealth has not been guaranteed in this system. Further
introduction of Western chemical pharmaceuticals threaten traditional medicine and therapies. 5From Closed to Open in India chapter abstract Decades ago
led by the technonational rhetoric of self-reliance and improvement in human health
India delayed opening its market. Consequently
India spent decades on import substitution and other exclusionary policies in a classic technonational system architecture like Japan. Later
India invested in generic-drug research and development and production capacity
complemented by advances in information technology. State-led human-capital development-for example
in the semi-independent Indian Institutes of Technologies (IITs)-targeted initially information technology and more recently has focused on biomedicine. Expatriate and diaspora returnee networks of Indian professionals
via its networked technonational architecture
since the 1990s have contributed to the development of innovative capacity and new ventures
but at a slower pace than in China. 6Singapore chapter abstract Singapore's developmental model had to be based within its multiethnic Chinese
Indian
and Malay population and from its very inception was global in outlook. Its meritocratic Economic Development Board (EDB) and Agency for Science
Technology and Research (A*STAR) tied inward FDI to domestic human-capital development and redistribution of internationally derived wealth to its domestic population. Its "guppies to whales" human-capital development programs contributed to productivity gains through attracting the region's best and brightest STEM youth and offering them citizenship. While the Singaporean city-state's small population has proven an impediment to establishing a critical mass of new technology entrepreneurs
open immigration policies have the potential to fast-track future developments. However
indigenous Singaporeans have been displaced in this process. 7Conclusion chapter abstract Chapter 7 summarizes the key findings of the book
reflecting on the framework of networked technonationalism and the conceptual typology of knowledge and networks. It compares variations in networked technonationalism as measured by variation in the knowledge and network architecture and governance regimes in China
India
Japan
and Singapore. The book concludes with theory and policy implications of networked technonationalism for Asia and the world economy.
Contents and Abstracts 1Introduction chapter abstract The book discusses the importance of global competition in biomedical and new-technology sectors to understanding international trade and investment in the twenty-first century. It argues that countries that pursue networked technonationalism (NTN) have been the most effective in improving innovation capacity and fostering frontier-industry growth. Technonationalism is state-led strategic investment in new technologies
perceived as key to national security. From the most closed system (Japan's classic technonationalism) to the most open
or technoglobal system (Singapore) technationalism exists on a continuum. A typology of knowledge and network regimes is proposed to explain variations in domestic capacities
institutions
and policy and network practices. Comparisons of human capital development (STEM education)
knowledge production (scientific citations and patents)
institutions supporting innovation (technology licensing organizations
incubators)
and interfirm networks and international openness (inward foreign direct investment
engaging with diaspora
and immigration) elucidate distinctions. 2Theory and Methods chapter abstract This chapter develops a matrix that plots variations in open/tacit versus closed/codified system architectures supporting or limiting innovation capacity and new-business creation in targeted sectors. Aggregate global- and microlevel data are analyzed to identify concentrations of innovation and firm-level activity. Emerging hubs of knowledge and firm creation in biomedical industries
including biopharmaceuticals
are identified. Aggregate data is supplemented with firm-level case studies and interviews with entrepreneurs
government officials
incubation managers
and investors. The conceptual framework outlined in Chapter 1 and specified in Chapter 2 provides the lens through which innovation and entrepreneurship strategies in China
India
Japan
and Singapore are viewed. The analysis is supplemented with firm-level entrepreneurial case studies. 3Classic Technonationalism in Japan chapter abstract Japan's strengths in intellectual property production have since the 1990s failed to translate into globally competitive new-product and new-business creation. Insular institutions and business practices have created "sticky" networks. These structures
while protecting weak industries from global competition
have trapped nascent entrepreneurs and undermined human-capital development. Yet Japan remains the largest market for biomedical products and services in Asia. Its aging population is driving ever-increasing health care consumption
while the shrinking size of its working population means that growth must be based on productivity gains. These demographics provide opportunities for foreign firms and investors to enter Japan
potentially enriching Japanese networks in the future. The Japanese state has encouraged international science and technology collaborations since 2000
which has led to growth in international copatenting
a potential first step to broader internationalization and open networks. 4New Networked Technonationalism in China chapter abstract Features of China's networked technonationalism (NTN) include aggressive science
technology
engineering
and math (STEM) education and entrepreneurship policies. Further
the biomedical industry has been identified by political and economic leaders as a "strategic emerging industry" and has become a focal point of state-led economic development. In contrast to Japan's insular and closed ("sticky") domestic knowledge and business networks
since the 1970s China's expatriate and diaspora returnee communities and active inward FDI have contributed to evolving globally competitive business networks. Over time
China used its growing domestic market as a lure to foreign firms from which technology appropriation can occur. However
China's population size and urban-rural disparities mean that egalitarian redistribution of new wealth has not been guaranteed in this system. Further
introduction of Western chemical pharmaceuticals threaten traditional medicine and therapies. 5From Closed to Open in India chapter abstract Decades ago
led by the technonational rhetoric of self-reliance and improvement in human health
India delayed opening its market. Consequently
India spent decades on import substitution and other exclusionary policies in a classic technonational system architecture like Japan. Later
India invested in generic-drug research and development and production capacity
complemented by advances in information technology. State-led human-capital development-for example
in the semi-independent Indian Institutes of Technologies (IITs)-targeted initially information technology and more recently has focused on biomedicine. Expatriate and diaspora returnee networks of Indian professionals
via its networked technonational architecture
since the 1990s have contributed to the development of innovative capacity and new ventures
but at a slower pace than in China. 6Singapore chapter abstract Singapore's developmental model had to be based within its multiethnic Chinese
Indian
and Malay population and from its very inception was global in outlook. Its meritocratic Economic Development Board (EDB) and Agency for Science
Technology and Research (A*STAR) tied inward FDI to domestic human-capital development and redistribution of internationally derived wealth to its domestic population. Its "guppies to whales" human-capital development programs contributed to productivity gains through attracting the region's best and brightest STEM youth and offering them citizenship. While the Singaporean city-state's small population has proven an impediment to establishing a critical mass of new technology entrepreneurs
open immigration policies have the potential to fast-track future developments. However
indigenous Singaporeans have been displaced in this process. 7Conclusion chapter abstract Chapter 7 summarizes the key findings of the book
reflecting on the framework of networked technonationalism and the conceptual typology of knowledge and networks. It compares variations in networked technonationalism as measured by variation in the knowledge and network architecture and governance regimes in China
India
Japan
and Singapore. The book concludes with theory and policy implications of networked technonationalism for Asia and the world economy.
perceived as key to national security. From the most closed system (Japan's classic technonationalism) to the most open
or technoglobal system (Singapore) technationalism exists on a continuum. A typology of knowledge and network regimes is proposed to explain variations in domestic capacities
institutions
and policy and network practices. Comparisons of human capital development (STEM education)
knowledge production (scientific citations and patents)
institutions supporting innovation (technology licensing organizations
incubators)
and interfirm networks and international openness (inward foreign direct investment
engaging with diaspora
and immigration) elucidate distinctions. 2Theory and Methods chapter abstract This chapter develops a matrix that plots variations in open/tacit versus closed/codified system architectures supporting or limiting innovation capacity and new-business creation in targeted sectors. Aggregate global- and microlevel data are analyzed to identify concentrations of innovation and firm-level activity. Emerging hubs of knowledge and firm creation in biomedical industries
including biopharmaceuticals
are identified. Aggregate data is supplemented with firm-level case studies and interviews with entrepreneurs
government officials
incubation managers
and investors. The conceptual framework outlined in Chapter 1 and specified in Chapter 2 provides the lens through which innovation and entrepreneurship strategies in China
India
Japan
and Singapore are viewed. The analysis is supplemented with firm-level entrepreneurial case studies. 3Classic Technonationalism in Japan chapter abstract Japan's strengths in intellectual property production have since the 1990s failed to translate into globally competitive new-product and new-business creation. Insular institutions and business practices have created "sticky" networks. These structures
while protecting weak industries from global competition
have trapped nascent entrepreneurs and undermined human-capital development. Yet Japan remains the largest market for biomedical products and services in Asia. Its aging population is driving ever-increasing health care consumption
while the shrinking size of its working population means that growth must be based on productivity gains. These demographics provide opportunities for foreign firms and investors to enter Japan
potentially enriching Japanese networks in the future. The Japanese state has encouraged international science and technology collaborations since 2000
which has led to growth in international copatenting
a potential first step to broader internationalization and open networks. 4New Networked Technonationalism in China chapter abstract Features of China's networked technonationalism (NTN) include aggressive science
technology
engineering
and math (STEM) education and entrepreneurship policies. Further
the biomedical industry has been identified by political and economic leaders as a "strategic emerging industry" and has become a focal point of state-led economic development. In contrast to Japan's insular and closed ("sticky") domestic knowledge and business networks
since the 1970s China's expatriate and diaspora returnee communities and active inward FDI have contributed to evolving globally competitive business networks. Over time
China used its growing domestic market as a lure to foreign firms from which technology appropriation can occur. However
China's population size and urban-rural disparities mean that egalitarian redistribution of new wealth has not been guaranteed in this system. Further
introduction of Western chemical pharmaceuticals threaten traditional medicine and therapies. 5From Closed to Open in India chapter abstract Decades ago
led by the technonational rhetoric of self-reliance and improvement in human health
India delayed opening its market. Consequently
India spent decades on import substitution and other exclusionary policies in a classic technonational system architecture like Japan. Later
India invested in generic-drug research and development and production capacity
complemented by advances in information technology. State-led human-capital development-for example
in the semi-independent Indian Institutes of Technologies (IITs)-targeted initially information technology and more recently has focused on biomedicine. Expatriate and diaspora returnee networks of Indian professionals
via its networked technonational architecture
since the 1990s have contributed to the development of innovative capacity and new ventures
but at a slower pace than in China. 6Singapore chapter abstract Singapore's developmental model had to be based within its multiethnic Chinese
Indian
and Malay population and from its very inception was global in outlook. Its meritocratic Economic Development Board (EDB) and Agency for Science
Technology and Research (A*STAR) tied inward FDI to domestic human-capital development and redistribution of internationally derived wealth to its domestic population. Its "guppies to whales" human-capital development programs contributed to productivity gains through attracting the region's best and brightest STEM youth and offering them citizenship. While the Singaporean city-state's small population has proven an impediment to establishing a critical mass of new technology entrepreneurs
open immigration policies have the potential to fast-track future developments. However
indigenous Singaporeans have been displaced in this process. 7Conclusion chapter abstract Chapter 7 summarizes the key findings of the book
reflecting on the framework of networked technonationalism and the conceptual typology of knowledge and networks. It compares variations in networked technonationalism as measured by variation in the knowledge and network architecture and governance regimes in China
India
Japan
and Singapore. The book concludes with theory and policy implications of networked technonationalism for Asia and the world economy.