Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Can the U.S. Navy Afford to Lose Its AMCM/Heavy Lift Helicopter Capability?]( "Can the U.S. Navy Afford to Lose Its AMCM/Heavy Lift Helicopter Capability?")
Can the U.S. Navy Afford to Lose Its AMCM/Heavy Lift Helicopter Capability?59,99 €![Analysis of Aafes and Its Relevance to the Future of the Army and Air Force]( "Analysis of Aafes and Its Relevance to the Future of the Army and Air Force")
Analysis of Aafes and Its Relevance to the Future of the Army and Air Force59,99 €![Expanding Fixed-Wing Aircraft Capability in U.S. Army Aviation Operations]( "Expanding Fixed-Wing Aircraft Capability in U.S. Army Aviation Operations")
Expanding Fixed-Wing Aircraft Capability in U.S. Army Aviation Operations59,99 €![The Relevance of Air Force Combat Support in Asymmetric Conflict]( "The Relevance of Air Force Combat Support in Asymmetric Conflict")
The Relevance of Air Force Combat Support in Asymmetric Conflict59,99 €![Fight for the Strategic Arsenal: Why the Navy and the Air Force Continue to Struggle for Relevance]( "Fight for the Strategic Arsenal: Why the Navy and the Air Force Continue to Struggle for Relevance")
Fight for the Strategic Arsenal: Why the Navy and the Air Force Continue to Struggle for Relevance59,99 €![Sustainment in a Secondary Theater: An Analysis of the Effect of Transportation on Campaign Execution in North Africa, 1941-1942, and its Relevance to]( "Sustainment in a Secondary Theater: An Analysis of the Effect of Transportation on Campaign Execution in North Africa, 1941-1942, and its Relevance to")
Sustainment in a Secondary Theater: An Analysis of the Effect of Transportation on Campaign Execution in North Africa, 1941-1942, and its Relevance to59,99 €![Vital Redundancy: The Case for Organic Airlift Capability in Air Force Special Operations Command]( "Vital Redundancy: The Case for Organic Airlift Capability in Air Force Special Operations Command")
Vital Redundancy: The Case for Organic Airlift Capability in Air Force Special Operations Command59,99 €
US Army aviation is undergoing an organizational and doctrinal evolution in order to be a relevant and capable force in the contemporary operational environment and on the battlefields of the future. Aviation has traditionally provided a unique operational capability of providing, in the third dimension of airspace, the mobility, agility, logistics, sustainment, and ability to mass significant combat power at the right place and time in support of ground maneuver forces. However, recent and ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan are being prosecuted in austere, remote, and noncontiguous theaters. These conditions have exemplified the importance of aviation's tactical and logistical support to the warfighter on the ground. The Army's organic intratheater lift fixed-wing and rotary-wing assets, specifically the C-23B Sherpa cargo airplane fleet and the CH-47D Chinook heavy-lift cargo helicopter fleet, have been heavily employed in the high operations tempo in Iraq and Afghanistan, and it has been determined that their legacy organizations and aircraft are not optimized to support protracted operations under such demanding conditions. This thesis focuses on analyzing the current and projected Army intratheater lift assets including the Future Cargo Aircraft and the under-development improved cargo helicopter program to determine whether Army aviation is headed down the right path to achieve operational success in the future. This study will also analyze the Army's projected aviation transformation organizational structure in order to make conclusions and recommendations to determine if the Army's intratheater fixed-wing and rotary-wing cargo assets will be relevant and capable to support the Future Force.