Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Die Wirkung der Östlichen Partnerschaft]( "Die Wirkung der Östlichen Partnerschaft")
Die Wirkung der Östlichen Partnerschaft41,90 €![The existential threat to Ukraine: its shaky military security]( "The existential threat to Ukraine: its shaky military security")
The existential threat to Ukraine: its shaky military security16,99 €![Double-Edged Sword]( "Double-Edged Sword")
Double-Edged Sword32,99 €![The Association Agreements with the European Union´s Eastern Partners]( "The Association Agreements with the European Union´s Eastern Partners")
The Association Agreements with the European Union´s Eastern Partners23,99 €![The Orange Revolution of Our Time]( "The Orange Revolution of Our Time")
The Orange Revolution of Our Time51,99 €![Impacts of the EU Accession on the Hungarian Nonprofit Sector]( "Impacts of the EU Accession on the Hungarian Nonprofit Sector")
Impacts of the EU Accession on the Hungarian Nonprofit Sector32,99 €![Energiesicherheit durch Institutionalisierung der Energiebeziehungen]( "Energiesicherheit durch Institutionalisierung der Energiebeziehungen")
Energiesicherheit durch Institutionalisierung der Energiebeziehungen49,00 €
It would not be an overstatement to say that the EU
and its enlargements have defined the history of
Europe since the World War II. The EU has already
experienced five waves of enlargement and the process
has not been easy and straightforward. But the
enlargement is still on the EU agenda. The paper
deals with the process of enlargement of the EU and
with two particular cases of accession with the
case of Turkey and the case of Ukraine. During the
past enlargements the main logic behind the process
was the idea of Europe . But it seems like it is not
applicable to the cases of Ukraine and Turkey. Thus
new arguments in favour and against the accession of
these countries are put forward. These new arguments
involve the reassessment of the EU, its identity and
its role in the world. Therefore both cases are very
complex and multifaceted. The countries themselves
add to this complexity.
In the paper I study and compare the accession paths
of each country and the factors, which facilitate and
impede their accession. My conclusion is that both
countries would eventually join the EU, but the
process will take a long time, not least than 15-20
years from now.
and its enlargements have defined the history of
Europe since the World War II. The EU has already
experienced five waves of enlargement and the process
has not been easy and straightforward. But the
enlargement is still on the EU agenda. The paper
deals with the process of enlargement of the EU and
with two particular cases of accession with the
case of Turkey and the case of Ukraine. During the
past enlargements the main logic behind the process
was the idea of Europe . But it seems like it is not
applicable to the cases of Ukraine and Turkey. Thus
new arguments in favour and against the accession of
these countries are put forward. These new arguments
involve the reassessment of the EU, its identity and
its role in the world. Therefore both cases are very
complex and multifaceted. The countries themselves
add to this complexity.
In the paper I study and compare the accession paths
of each country and the factors, which facilitate and
impede their accession. My conclusion is that both
countries would eventually join the EU, but the
process will take a long time, not least than 15-20
years from now.