Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Bind Me Tender, Bind Me Do!]( "Bind Me Tender, Bind Me Do!")
Bind Me Tender, Bind Me Do!59,35 €![The Syntax of Numeral Noun Constructions]( "The Syntax of Numeral Noun Constructions")
The Syntax of Numeral Noun Constructions67,25 €![Word Order Matters]( "Word Order Matters")
Word Order Matters49,95 €![Minimalist Syntax for Quantifier Raising, Topicalization and Focus Movement: A Search and Float Approach for Internal Merge]( "Minimalist Syntax for Quantifier Raising, Topicalization and Focus Movement: A Search and Float Approach for Internal Merge")
Minimalist Syntax for Quantifier Raising, Topicalization and Focus Movement: A Search and Float Approach for Internal Merge74,99 €![Symmetry Breaking and Symmetry Restoration]( "Symmetry Breaking and Symmetry Restoration")
Symmetry Breaking and Symmetry Restoration67,75 €![Valency in Verbs and Verb-Related Structures]( "Valency in Verbs and Verb-Related Structures")
Valency in Verbs and Verb-Related Structures72,65 €![The Non-Surviving Preterite-Present Verbs in English]( "The Non-Surviving Preterite-Present Verbs in English")
The Non-Surviving Preterite-Present Verbs in English70,50 €
The study presented in this book aimed to test the argument structure of ditransitive verbs in Polish with the use of quantifier scope interpretation. Since these verbs typically allow for relatively free object order, it is not clear whether any of the object orders is basic or if they constitute separate underlying structures. The study reports the results of five experiments testing acceptability of scope interpretation of Polish quantified objects in two object orders, using variables such as coordination, to reveal which scope changing mechanism is responsible for ambiguity. The results showed that only the DO-IO order allowed for scope ambiguity, however, to a different degree depending on the semantic class of the verb. This indicates that the merge position of objects is contingent upon that factor.